For all you Harry Potter fans who are also devoted to a certain series of teen-vampire romance novels, here’s something that should help you deal with Thursday’s devastating news about Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince being pushed back to next summer. Summit Entertainment announced today that with Harry having vacated the November 21 spot, they’re going to fill it with Twilight, bumping it up a full three weeks from its original date of December 12.

While some fans wondered, irrationally, if the Harry Potter move was to get away from Twilight, Summit’s CEO says Twilight never had any delusions of being more powerful than the boy wizard at the box office. “With a giant franchise like Harry Potter in the market, we had to stay clear of it,” Rob Friedman told Variety — hence the original date well away from Half-Blood Prince. “Their move created an opportunity to bring the movie to fans three weeks earlier.”

Once November 21 opened up, the move was really a no-brainer. As a press release from Summit points out, movie theaters get very crowded around the holidays, and Twilight will be able to open on far more screens on November 21 than it could have on December 12. Now it’ll be opening the Friday before Thanksgiving, too, which is nearly always a plus. Its only competition will be Disney’s animated Bolt. The only loser here is Entertainment Weekly, whose Fall Movie Preview is now wrong again, before most readers have even seen it. (Or, from another point of view, now that issue is even more of a collector’s item.)

What do you say? Are you excited about getting Twilight sooner? To those of you who have been sending Warner Bros. wrathful messages about the Harry Potter move, does this quell your anger somewhat? Will you at least be able to live and function and carry on?

I was just re-watching Eugene Jarecki’s terrific documentary Why We Fight the other day and wondering, “man, how did this not win an Oscar?” Both its ineligibility and the strength of the 2006 feature documentary category aside, it’s a really great visual essay on the problems of the U.S. military — particularly the allowance for the military industrial complex to grow so large — since the mid-20th century. If you’ve never seen it, you should. It’ll bring you up to speed right up to the Iraq War (and feel free to make it an informative double feature by following it up with Charles Ferguson’s No End in Sight).

For his next feature, Jarecki is sticking to the subject of war, though he’s going back and focusing on Vietnam, specifically the evacuation of U.S. troops from Saigon in 1975 (maybe it can parallel an exit from Iraq? huh? maybe?). He and screenwriter Jesse Wigutow (It Runs in the Family) are basing the doc, titled Irreparable Harm, on former CIA agent Frank Snepp’s book “Irreparable Harm: A Firsthand Account of How One Agent Took on the CIA in an Epic Battle Over Free Speech,” which details the author’s struggle with the federal government after he published his Saigon evacuation document, “Decent Interval.”

Jarecki’s film, which is being produced for HBO Films, will be more about Snepp than on the history, and hopefully that won’t get him in trouble with the feds too. Also, here’s hoping that Irreparable Harm at least makes Jarecki eligible to be nominated for the Oscar he deserves.

When two movies with similar plots hit theaters around the same time, it usually just reveals the vapidity of Hollywood formula (as was the case when Deep Impact and Armageddon came out a few months apart). The situation changes, however, when the subject matter has far more thematic weight. Defamer’s S.T. VanAirsdale points out the potential conflict brewing now that The Weinstein Company has picked up U.S. theatrical, DVD and television rights to the 2004 German film Operation Valykrie, a dramatization of the failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hilter during World War II. Sound familiar? That’s because Bryan Singer’s upcoming 2009 release, Valkyrie, tells precisely the same story, with Tom Cruise in the role of would-be assassin Col. Claus Von Stauffenberg. In the German movie, the character is played by Sebastian Koch, the debonair star of The Lives of Others and Paul Verhoeven’s Black Book.

In addition to the overlapping content, VanAirsdale points out another potential conflict: Koch’s female co-star in Black Book, the alluring Carice van Houten, stars opposite Cruise in Valkyrie, creating the sort of meaty overlap that money can buy. Harvey Weinstein’s no slouch when it comes to instigating controversy, but his company hasn’t exactly had the best of luck with its recent daring titles (few turned out for Where in the World is Osama bin Laden?). Personal drama has impacted Cruise’s films before, but this might be the rare case where he would have nothing to do with it.

Now that you know what Josh Brolin’s George W. Bush will look like, you should know that you’ll get to see him in action real soon — probably sooner than you thought. The ever-courageous Lionsgate has picked up Oliver Stone’s W, and plans to release it on October 17th. Of this year. That’s 2008. Before the election. Notably, the movie hasn’t even started shooting yet — it goes into production on May 12th in Louisiana.

I never really thought the film would fail to find distribution, though early buzz on the screenplay has been fairly toxic. I did think there was going to be a race between when W would be finished and when Dubya would be finished — that is, out of office. But apparently Stone is not messing around and plans to deliver the film in a few months, with Lionsgate hoping to capitalize on the furor that will surround the election.

Jeez — maybe it’s because I read too many blogs (or because I live in Pennsylvania, suddenly a battleground state), but it’s barely May and I’m already tired of the election. Is W really how people will want to spend their leisure time in late October? I can’t imagine, but I respect the folks at Lionsgate enough to think they know what they’re doing. Incidentally: Dick Cheney remains uncast. Any suggestions?